Michigan Op-ed We Deserve Better #Incarcerated


In 1976 William Garrison was 16 years old, barely old enough to drive, when he was sentenced to life without parole for murder. In January 2020, Garrison was resentenced to a term of 40 to 90 years, following the 2018 U.S. Supreme Court ban on life-without-parole sentences for juveniles. By that time, Garrison had already served more than his minimum sentence. In April, he accepted a parole offer, and his release date was set for May 6.

His sister, Yolanda Peterson, had agreed to house him, and both siblings looked forward to reuniting.


Garrison never made it to his release date. He was pronounced dead on April 13, 2020, at Macomb Correctional Facility in Lenox Township, Michigan. A postmortem test confirmed he had contracted the coronavirus. His death came just 24 days before his release.


As of March, 40% of people (15,757 individuals) incarcerated in Michigan prisons have tested positive for COVID-19, resulting in 91 inmate and 3 correction officer deaths.


The tragedy of Mr. Garrison displays Michigan’s horrific negligence of the state's incarcerated population. A lack of PPE, and infrequency in testing, and an inability to enforce social distancing or quarantining have put thousands of incarcerated individuals and staff at risk and enforced a cyclical spread of infection (infection can take place every 90 days). Many individuals confined within the legal system are disproportionately vulnerable to severe reactions to COVID-19 both because of their elder status and the high rates of chronic disease within prison populations. But the inhumane-punitive nature of Michigan’s prison system, as well as prison across the country, has left incarcerated populations bearing the brunt of COVID-19 infection, with no end in sight.


More recently on December 2, 2020, ---- known as DJ, was found dead in his cell in the Gus Harrison Correctional Facility in Adrian, Michigan, from complications of coronavirus. Just three weeks earlier, DJ had returned to the facility after undergoing open-heart surgery, a result of his battle with multiple sclerosis (MS). He had survived an initial contraction of the virus in April.


In the case of the Gus Harrison Correctional Facility, the virus was first reported on April 7 after the introduction of a step-down unit - over 110 individuals from prisons across the state who had previously tested positive for the virus. The Michigan Department of Corrections (MDOC) said the facility, which had no reported cases prior to the step-down population, was chosen because of its layout, with the unit (known as unit 6) located outside of the perimeter of the Gus Harrison Facility.


But such promises of separation and security from unit 6 quickly failed; within a week of the introduction of the step-down program, individuals on the southside (level I, those closest to unit 6) of the Gus Harrison facility began testing positive. By May, MDOC reported that 716 inmates and 31 staff members had tested positive for COVID-19. The administration responded by separating the facility, with the hope of keeping the virus from spreading to level II and level IV units. Currently, 1,150 of the facility’s 1,948 prison population has tested positive for the virus; the death toll sits at five incarcerated individuals and one staff member.


“It’s no secret that employees are the main cause of how the virus is seeping into prisons in Michigan,” Ricardo Ferrell, a 63-year old who has served nearly 40 years in prison, remarked in a recent interview. “We continue to be put at risk by the gross negligence of MDOC. There is no way an incarcerated individual can go out into society by day and contract the virus and come back at night to spread it; it’s just not possible.”


Mr. Ferrell points to an inherent flaw within the system: the daily flow of untested staff members into and out of the state’s 29 correctional facilities. As Joey Horan argues in an op-ed published in the Detroit Free Press, MDOC has been well aware of its vulnerability to outbreaks. Beginning in March, the agency implemented a number of policies centered on reducing prisoner contact with new sources of the virus: it halted in-person visits. But few measures were enacted to reduce infection of the 9,500 corrections officers and staff who enter Michigan’s prisons on a daily basis - putting both prison populations and Michigan communities at risk


Staff shortages and increased requests for overtime have resulted in many staff traveling back and forth between infected-quarantine housing units to “negative” units. Dennis Vessey, an individual within Gus Harrison, remarked that “officers work entire shifts in infected units, even working doubles, and without showering or changing clothes, are stationed in negative areas where they perform pat-downs, shakedowns, and interact with folks.”


In July, Randy Rumler, an MDOC veteran, who was working in food service at the Guss Harrison facility, passed away after battling COVID-19. Rumbler was one of a handful of individuals within the prison's food service to contract the virus. But several currently incarcerated individuals have noted that while the number of food staff testing positive for the virus continued to increase, there was no initial protocol to replace food service workers or even enforce daily testing of the kitchen staff. As a result, kitchens have been relatively shut down, the facilities population has been left to eat cold food. Such treatment overlooks the dietary restrictions and overarching human nutrition of the populous, leaving individuals even more prone to contracting the virus.


Leroy Washington, an individual at Gus Harrison, who tested positive for the virus after exposure to kitchen staff, described the conditions of a “positive” unit: “for the majority of the day 240 positive individuals are cooped up in the unit. We are constantly breathing in the air that other sick people are breathing out. Ventilation is poor and we are overcrowded. Our only protection is three cloth masks made from the material of our uniforms.” Mr. Washington’s brother, who is incarcerated within the same facility, is at high risk because of several underlying health issues. “MDOC has no interest in protecting us,” Washington continued, “they haven’t even begun to put in preventative measures, they are only reactive. And the result is men contacting the virus again and again.”


In April, a class-action lawsuit was filed against MDOC for its handling of the virus in prisons, claiming a violation of incarcerated individuals’ Eighth Amendment rights, which prohibits cruel and unusual punishment. According to the lawsuit, individuals are often double-bunked in a cell or occupy units with multiple people, telephones and kiosks are not disinfected between each use, and soap is rationed because many inmates can't afford to buy it. Individuals are also barred from using hand sanitizer, which is considered contraband. The lawsuit calls for adequate social distancing, as outlined by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines and the testing of all incarcerated people.


According to the Michigan Corrections Organization, the MDOC received a budget of $2.06 billion for FY 2020-202. In response to the pandemic, the department received an additional $197 million from the federal government. While Chris Gautz, MDOC communication noted that that MDOC has already spent $30 million on testing since the onset of the pandemic, the overarching issue is that many such costs could have been avoided with an earlier response, the release of individuals and granting of early parole, and proper protective measure.


It should also be noted that while Michigan prisons are cramped, unhygienic, and designed to inhibit a person’s ability to protect themselves, infections within incarcerated populations are commonplace, from hepatitis to HIV, to the common cold. MDOC had ample time and practice to appropriately respond to infection It’s failures to do so have left both the state's incarcerated population and larger Michigan population at immense risk.


Further, no crime in the United States carries a punishment of exposure to — and potential death by — lethal virus. Michigan's acceptance of illness and death of its justice-involved individuals, displays a degrade of leadership morality, endangerment of citizen health, a waste of taxpayer funds, and a perpetuation of racial injustice.


COVID-19 is a public health issue that needs a holistic, wide-reaching response.


As Mr. Ferrell said; “It’s a really sad affair, this virus is spreading and we are just sitting ducks. The bottom line is many of us are in jeopardy of losing our lives to coronavirus. We deserve better.”


Notes

Incarcerated people taking care of incarcerated people

People with covid taking care of people with Covid

Focus on mental health and Quentin

Full-length one in the newsletter (with all anecdotes) AND shortened version

Outline takeaway from each anecdote

What's happening on the ground -- Shawanna narrative

Williams story -- state the problem -- what Shawana is doing right now -- back into issues/takeaways


By mid-May, MDOC reported that 716 inmates and 31 staff members had tested positive for COVID-19. By August, over 37% of the more than 1,900 inmates at Gus Harrison Correctional Facility in Adrian have been infected with the coronavirus, resulting in the deaths of four staff members and four incarcerated individuals.


His sentence was He in In April 2020, after serving 44 years behind bars, the 60-year old Black man was just


At the age of 63, Ricardo Farrell has spent more than half of his life behind bars. Since 1982 he has been serving a parolable life sentence for second-degree murder.


Willam Garrison


On December 2, 2020, ---- known as DJ, was found dead in his cell in the Gus Harrison Correctional Facility in Adrian, Michigan where he was incarcerated, from complications of COVID-19.


Just three weeks earlier, DJ had returned to the facility after undergoing open-heart surgery, a result of his battle with multiple sclerosis (MS). But even as he was wheeled back into the prison unit, newly confined to a wheelchair, DJ remained cheerful - a characteristic he was well known for. A man in his late forties, he had been in prison for x years, and was well respected and liked by those around him. But as much as he endured, his reentering of the Gus Harrison facility in mid-November would pose the biggest challenge to his health, and ultimately end his life.


The facility's first cases were reported on April 7 after the introduction of a step-down unit - over 110 individuals from prisons across the state who had previously tested positive for the virus. The Michigan Department of Corrections (MDOC) said the facility, which had no reported cases prior to the step-down population, was chosen because of its layout. But by mid-May, MDOC reported that 716 inmates and 31 staff members had tested positive for COVID-19. By August, over 37% of the more than 1,900 inmates at Gus Harrison Correctional Facility in Adrian have been infected with the coronavirus, resulting in the deaths of four staff members and four incarcerated individuals.


In late April, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Michigan for its handling of the virus in prisons, claiming that the state had violated an individual's Eighth Amendment rights. At this point, half of Michigan's prison population had tested positive for the virus.


On November 13, 2020, an incarcerated individual who worked in the kitchen of Gus Harrison, tested positive for COVID-19. A day later, on November 14, three more individuals within the foodservice received positive test results. Within two weeks, cases were in the hundreds, spreading from the housing unit to the housing unit. Dj, among many others who had fallen victim to the outbreak, found himself separated into a sector of the prison designated for those who had tested positive.


Gus Harrison Correctional Facility

● Michigan department of corrections

● November 13, 2020, an incarcerated person who worked as a baker tested positive for COVID

● Nov. 14 3 more workers in the foodservice tested positive

● Since then, hundreds of prisoners, DJ included, tested positive (many of them in close quarters with food service workers

● No protocol to replace all prison food service workers or tet food service works daily. Vicus continues to spread within their respective housing units where hundred live

● Integration of infected prisoners into the general population

○ With overcrowding at other facilities, prisoners with covid have been transferred to Gus Harrison and housed with folks who didn't have the virus (done before kitchen outbreak)

● Correctional officers travel back and forth between infected-quarantined housing units to “negative tested housing units) - putting everyone at risk.

○ Officers work entire shifts in infected units, even working doubles, and without showering or changing clothes, been stationed in negative areas where they perform pat-downs, shakedowns, and interact with folks

● As of Dec. 1, it is estimated (by Dennis Vesey) that over 50% of the entire level two prison population has contracted the virus in the span of three weeks - the entire population could be infected in an additional weeks

● Leroy Washington - tested positive for the virus

DJ (who is he?)

● The late 40s, early 50s

● Wheelchair-bound because of MS (recent)

● 12/3/20 returned to Gus Harrison after open-heart surgery

● Cheerful, well respected

Shawnna Call recording - Quentin Jones

● People who have had the virus 2-3 times at this point. There is no real protocol in place to keep folks from catching the virus, reducing spread, and reducing a cycle of spread

● No PPE equipment is provided. Each prisoner was given 4 masks made out of the materials of their jumpsuits. No cleaning supplies, hand sanitizer

● No social distance or six feet. Cellmates.

● The biggest concern is the cycle of covid happening in the facility. Can catch it every 90 days. The same people where the virus started to spread are the ones still surviving the food. None of the food or overarching diet changed. All food is cold. Severely inadequate healthcare - no vital care. Didn't even get results from a nurse. Symptoms have to be severe before a nurse comes

○ Healthcare and neglect become murder

○ Protocols insufficient - consensus around here is that they are trying to give it to us. Even though they test the officers, they don’t require them to stay home while awaiting results. Instead, they come to work and end up spreading it to folks throughout their unit and then get a call of a positive infection.


Some relevant parts from my health justice op-ed:

Quentin Jones, who developed hypertension during 22 years of incarceration in Michigan prisons, is another individual Ms. Vaughn’s is advocating for. Despite being considered a chronic care patient, Mr. Jones was denied medical treatment after complaining about chest pain and shortness of breath. It usually takes at least a week for him to be seen by a nurse. This particular time, it took three months.


After finally being granted medical care, Mr. Jones was told his pain was due to the mask he’s required to wear because of the pandemic. He was sent back to his unit and charged $5 for his visit. To put it in perspective, Mr. Jones makes $8 a month for working while incarcerated. He often faces the harrowing choice between medical care and essentials like soap and toothpaste.


Despite suffering from his own ailments, Mr. Jones tries to help his friend, Elijah Robinson, who is experiencing even worse neglect. Mr. Robinson has a urethra kidney stent that must be changed every three months. He has not been taken to get it changed since June 2019.


This past May, Mr. Robinson began experiencing severe pain and found blood in his urine. After finally being taken to the infirmary in June, he was told that because of COVID his problems were “non-essential.” He was finally sent to an offsite clinic in early July. Upon his arrival, he was informed that the clinic did not perform the stent replacement. Mr. Robinson is grieving the process and has yet to receive proper care.


In 1976, the Supreme Court ruled, in Estelle v. Gamble, that it is considered cruel and unusual punishment, an eighth amendment violation if prison personnel act with “deliberate indifference” to illness or injury. But, the decision fails to define the line between the constitutionality of different medical responses, leaving unclear whether time, level of care, or the occurrence of a pandemic can alter the definition of “cruel and unusual.” The ruling found that failing to run certain tests or take certain measures may not be an issue of constitutionality, but of medical negligence that can be adjudicated in state court.


Further, a 1994 ruling, Farmer v. Brennan, sought to define exactly what qualifies as deliberate indifference. Eighth amendment evaluations require a subjective inquiry into the state of mind of the officials who are inflicting the punishment. This requires evidence of reckless behavior, such as failing to treat individuals who report health concerns, but it cannot be fully satisfied unless culpability is proven, like an official knowing the risk at hand - or being ignorant to the obvious risk - and refusing to provide medical care.


Though costly and strenuous, legal remedies - such as civil lawsuits or petitions for a Writ of Habeas Corpus - are necessary and available for our incarcerated population. Mr. Robinson and Mr. Jones deserve to gain relief for their inhumane treatment. Still, people are suffering and dying in prison and there needs to be a radical change that prevents these violations in the first place.

Thanks to Assemblyman Jewell Jones of the 13th district in Inkster, MI for supporting the voices of the incarcerated and hearing their Silent Cries.

#statevsusmag #covid #silentcry

Featured Posts